Monday, March 18, 2013

New Ideas for your Pesach Seder

Take a break from the cleaning, and get your mind thinking about Pesach! Here are a bunch of classes that I have written over the years. I am sharing them now so that you may prepare early for Seder Night.

Please feel free to share, and to use as a basis for discussions around your seder table.

Enjoy!

The Psychology of Chametz Why is Hametz forbidden on Pesach? What is the philosophy behind the ban on Hametz? We offer 4 possibilities.

Matza and the High-Speed Redemption - Matza must be baked in less than 18 minutes. What is the symbolism of this "fast-food"? Why does the Exodus have to be so quick? We shall discuss what happens in the life of the nation, and in our personal lives, when we make rapid transitions. Are they beneficial or harmful? From Rav Tzadok of Lublin to Rav Kook, from the Exodus to the Ethiopian Aliyah, join our journey.

Earning Redemption! Did Israel "Earn" or deserve to be redeemed from Egypt? Were the Jews assimilated or strong in their Jewish Identity? How does this impact contemporary questions of Galut (Exile) and Geula (Redemption)?

Arami Oved Avi: Peshat and Drash Arami Oved Avi (צא ולמד) suggests that Lavan wanted to kill Yaakov. We shall study this text in peshat and d'rash to reveal a new understanding of the Haggadah.

The Maror in the Matza


The Haggadah: Past, Present and Future When we sit at our Seder, are we reliving the past, or should we be concentrating on how the past enlightens our future?

The Ten Plagues: דצ"ך עד"ש באח"ב Why are the Plagues grouped into a strange mnemonic? Why did God need to bring so many plagues? Could he not have inflicted Egypt with a single mega-Plague?

Test of the Exodus: Blood on the Doorposts Why did the Jews need to smear blood on their doorposts? Was it something magical?

Chag Kasher Vesameach!

Sunday, March 03, 2013

Bezalel, Marathons and a Healthy Israeli Society


This week's parashat Hashavua introduces us to the chief artisan of the Mishkan (Tabernacle) – Bezalel - who designed and crafted all the Temple artifacts.

 In 1906, a visionary named Boris Shatz founded the first art institute of the new Yishuv, in Jerusalem. Called Bezalel, it was the first educational academy in which the language of instruction was Hebrew. Shatz perceived of Bezalel as a center for the birth of a new Hebraic art, a powerhouse of spiritual energy that would radiate its ideals to the entire Jewish people and inspire a renewed national identity.

Rav Kook wrote a beautiful letter to the founders of Bezalel in which he expressed his feeling that this school signified a paradigm shift on the national situation; it was a sign of Israel's national reawakening:

"The dear and beautiful girl, after a long illness, with her face pallid, bluish lips, burning fever and convulsions … behold, she opens her eyes and her tightly sealed lips, her little hands move with renewed life … seeking their purpose. Her lips move, almost returned to their normal color, and a voice is heard, as if from the dead: "Mother, Mother; the doll! Give me the doll! The dear doll which I have not seen for so long!" A voice of joy and a voice of gladness, all are delighted, the father, the mother, brothers and sisters… "Little Shoshana is asking for the doll!" Thank God, a sign for the good… "Hurray! little Shoshana, so beautiful and sweet, has asked for her doll."

Rav Kook depicts the national interest in aesthetics as a demonstration of a Jewish return to health and vitality. He offers a powerful story of a child who has experienced life-threatening illness which have brought her to a feverish lifeless situation. All are concerned for her well-being. But then, she regains some color, she begins to move. She has thankfully, turned a corner, her illness is receding. Suddenly, she asks for her favorite toy; her doll. Everyone responds with sheer delight as this is the most obvious indication of recovery, of a return to her real self; the child is on the road to a full recovery. Now, Rav Kook names his imaginary child Shoshana, and as such she is a metaphor for our nation, which is sometimes also named "Shoshana" (Shir Hashirim 2:1). For Rav Kook, the renewed interest in artistic expression reflects a return to health for the nation, to normal national living, a national recovery:

Jerusalem, the beloved, this lily of the vales (shoshanat ha'makim), this dear daughter of Zion, this precious daughter is afflicted with the bitter disease of the Exile, prolonged and stormy … Many of the weak-hearted have lost hope for her life. Now a life-giving stream has gently shaken the sick depressed bones, and she demands beauty and works of art. Practical men will say that perhaps this is not the proper moment that there are priorities and more essential needs. Yes, perhaps, there are needs, but this request from [Jerusalem's] children's heart, from the spirit that she bestowed on them, is itself a sign of life, a sign of hope for salvation and comfort.

Rav Kook identified the arts as indicative of Israel returning to health, to itself.  Admittedly, for him it was only the "doll." Important nation building activities: immigration, agriculture, infrastructure, military, government, judiciary, Torah were clearly a more significant and vital objective if we were to rebuild our nation in its country. But nonetheless, that doll - the arts - retain their status as a manifestation of life. After all, every nation also has song, theatre, music, poetry, dance, handicrafts.

And I would argue that this is not merely true at the national level but also on the personal level. To be a healthy individual, we all have artistic needs. People need to connect, to express ourselves in a whole range of expressive and creative avenues in order to be healthy, feeling, thinking, balanced, individuals.

These areas of expression are not peripheral to the "serious" aspects of our national and personal life. They are frequently as basic and essential as the air we breath and the ground upon which we walk because they are the truest expressions of life – of our spirit, our emotions and feelings, of our "divine image" which allows us to be creative, energized, to explore, critique, to build, to change, to grow, to feel, to love, to mourn, celebrate, laugh and cry.

I say all this as my community, the religious-Zionist community, has developed in this regard quite dramatically in the past twenty years. From a sector which was rather bland, emotionally closed, defensive and and monolithic a generation ago, we now have an entire range of institutions: Maaleh – film school, Mashiv Haruach – poetry; Emunah – art school ; Orot – dance, and all sorts of expressions of music, arts, and so forth. High schools all have art, dance, drama and film options, for boys and for girls. People can use the right hemisphere of the brain and engage in their non-analytical side.There is room for exploration and expression.

Moreover, many of the products of these institutions engage in some very Jewish and Israeli soul-searching in their artistic output. In other words, their art or dance is not merely imitating what they see in the secular world. It is coming from a genuine internal place in which art fuses with faith and religion, engaging in a special conversation. This is just one dimension in which the Modern-Orthodox space in Israel is hugely exciting in that young (and old) people have such breadth, so many avenues of expression and exploration, so many opportunities for interplay and fusion between so many options in the religious and national rainbow.[This is not happening in the Haredi community as they generally stifle expressive arts of this sort. In the secular world which is highly artistic, art will connect with the individual, or the national, but less the sources of religion and its deep spiritual manifestations, as religion is not the life they lead. Of course many artists who are engaged in religion, do embody this fusion: Ehud Banai, Etti Ankri, Bari Sacharov, Evyatar Banai, Shuli Rand, Kobi Oz, and others ... this si also a new and exciting wave of Jewish creativity]

But beyond direct relationship to religion, when 20,000 people fill the street to exercise, many of them for charity, all of them to enhance their health, in a carnival which spans all of Jerusalem, that is a unique sense of public culture, peoplehood, sport, body, people and soul. The Jewish people are alive. One of my running friends, who ran the 10k with all her kids, put it this way: I love watching all those Jews running - and they're not running away from no Egyptians or Cossacks ...  pretty historic. For me, its a Zionist moment on steroids."

I constantly walk around the streets here staring at the billboards that announce cultural events , just marveling at the revival in our nation, the remarkable power of artistic expression, the amazing honest self reflection that we witness in our movies, writers and poets, the depth of Judaism that is reflected in so much theatre, photography, writing.

And I feel privileged to be part of my living and breathing nation, alive, and running through Jerusalem's streets.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Contemporary Purim Reflections 5773/2013



As we celebrate Purim, I have been thinking about how radically different our experience of Purim is here in Israel in 2013, when contrasted with that of my ancestors who lived in Europe (Poland, Germany) only one-hundred years ago. I will try to explain and fully articulate this sentiment.

1. From Powerlessness to Sovereign Power

One insight that comes into focus in the Megilla is surely the dependence of the Jews upon the foreign power that hosts them and thus the fragility of their existence in Galut.

Let us begin with the closing lines of the Megilla:

"And King Ahasuerus imposed a tax upon the land and on the isles of the sea. And all the acts of his power and his might and the full account of Mordecai's greatness, how the king advanced him-are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Media and Persia? For Mordecai the Jew was viceroy to King Ahasuerus … seeking the good of his people…"

What is the purpose of these lines? Why mention the tax? What else do we observe here? Rav Yoni Grossman suggests that this section drives home the fact that when ultimately, despite the victory of Esther and Mordechai, all the prestige and power of Mordechai is framed within the context of the Persian government. The REAL power is held by Achashverosh; he can even impose taxes upon the far-flung islands. Note too how Mordechai's greatness is recorded specifically in the Chronicles of Media and Persia. This notion of "chronicles of kings", of "Divrei Hayamim," is quite familiar from our Tanakh, where our history is recorded in the "Chronicles of the kings of Israel and Judah." In this vein Rav Yoni Grossman comments:

"… the reader who recalls the kings of Israel and of Judah, in light of this expression, cannot but dwell on the chasm separating the kingdom of Achashverosh from the kingdom of Israel in its own land; the chasm separating the "Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Media and Persia" and the "Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel/Judah." In other words, the whole story narrated in Esther is the story of the Persians; it is the story of Achashverosh and his kingdom! This expression is, to a large extent, a biting one specifically because of its inclusion at the end of the story. The narrator is telling his readers, as it were: "When all is said and done, the exile is still the same exile; the king is the same king, and the Jews of Shushan remain where they are. This is not really a story about the Jews. Even if they played an important role in the plot, all in all this was nothing but an episode in the story of the Persians, the ‘kings of Media and Persia.'"


Yoram Hazony takes this a stage further in his book, "The Dawn,"
To live in a society ruled by others means that the government and the laws are not the product of a Jewish concern for the general public interest, and that they are certainly not the result of an interest in the well-being of the Jews as a nation; that Jewish intellectual endeavors are under constant pressure, whether overt or implicit, to conform to alien norms; and that Jewish leadership, if it is capable and effective, is perpetually viewed with a certain measure of suspicion and even fear-both by the community of non-Jews, and by members of the Jewish community concerned that Jewish success may be interpreted by the gentiles as a challenge to their authority.

So what I am saying is that essentially, the Purim story is a story of temporary salvation, of real danger which is averted by political manipulation.

How do we view this from a modern Israeli perspective, from the vantage point of Jewish sovereign self-governance?

The modern Israeli is disdainful of this Galut existence in which we fail to determine our national future. Israeli's don't want to be dancing to anyone else's tune. To an Israeli ear, in an era where Israelis have an army to protect them, and will fight openly and proudly against our foes, the Megilla sounds too much like an expression of powerlessness, vulnerability, and dependence on foreign favor.

2. Jewish Violence: From Fantasy to Danger

At most moments during our 2000 year of global wanderings, the Purim story in which Jews actually killed their enemies, was absolutely unrealistic. Rabbi Daniel Landes recently described it as a comic fantasy in which Jews get their vengeance on their most feared oppressors. However, I doubt that their were any Jews in the past 2000 years who harboured genuine plans of killing thousands of the anti-Semites who threatened them. The mitzvah to wipe out Amalek was entirely theoretical, and represented a idealized fight against forces of evil, something that we could philosophize about , and we were unlikely to enact.

And suddenly, we have Medinat Yisrael. We have weapons; we have the most powerful military in the Middle East. We really can kill our enemies. And now, how shall we relate to the mitzvah of Amalek? Now, a mitzvah that calls for vengeance and killing, a festival that celebrates avenging our enemies – this becomes dangerous stuff, especially after the Baruch Goldstein massacre. The notion of Amalek when abused will have devastating impact, and hence, Purim must be accompanied by caution, and our discussions of Amalek must be regulated and qualified.

--

One hundred years ago, a Jew in Poland or Russia, or Morocco, may have identified with the Shushan reality as not that different from his own. The paradigms were familiar. Purim is the quintessential holiday of survival in exile, repeated time after time around the diaspora.

Purim in Israel today then, is radically different from one-hundred years ago. We engage it in a manner unknown to our Galut forebears. And in that case, we have to wonder about the message that Purim can offer us here and now. What is the message that Purim should communicate?

Here are some thoughts that occur to me:

  • The Persistence of Jew hatred. We need to use Purim to remind ourselves of how – from Haman to Hitler, from Aquinas to Ahaminajad - Jew-hatred is alive and well. It is irrational, but extremely deadly. We would do well to fight it whenever it raises its ugly head.
  • The Impermanence of Stability. The analysis that I gave above, suggested that life in Shushan, to an Israeli ear, sounds impossibly vulnerable. However, even in an era of statehood and Jewish power, we need to recall that stability is never permanent, and that despite the illusions of security, the situation can turn dire at any given moment. Possibly Shushan is closer than we think. We should never get too overconfident.
Of course, there are many other messages within the Megilla itself. If you have anything to add, please do so in the comments below.

Purim Sameach!

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Quick Election Analysis - the morning after


1.      The press is talking about blocs of left-wing and right-wing. They are talking an old language. They don’t understand what happened yesterday. So much of the analysis is so old-hat. Yesterday created a new paradigm – one that I am  excited about
2.      Goldberg (http://www.theatlantic.com/jeffrey-goldberg/) talks about a Knesset with 40% dati MK's. It may be true, but it is not that relevant.
3.      All the world press said this would be the most right-wing rascist government. They were wrong. The center won.
4.      This election was about new politics that overlooks whether you are right or left, dati or hiloni.
5.      Both Bennet and Lapid brought honesty to the table. Israelis said "no" to dirty politics. They want transparency. Lapid and Bennet won because they offered principles which they promise to follow.
6.      Israeli hard-working, Zionist, "social protest" society won yesterday. It said that we want a future for our children. We will work hard, but everyone should serve, pay taxes, and the government should serve its citizens.
7.      Bennet had a secular woman on his list. Yesh Atid has many religious MK's. What matters is whether you follow the mainstream Israeli-Zionist way.
8.      Likud lost support due to not appreciating all this, but also because people didn't want to vote for extremism (if they want right-wingers they can vote for Bennet), nor for criminals, nor for a party that is hijacked by political manipulation. The honest center won yesterday.
9.      The peace issue is on the back-burner. It isn't going anywhere fast, but us Israelis can wait for that. In the meantime we are building our society.
10. And one further thing - new faces. People don't want the same old tired politicians, who lack the solutions to the big questions. People are looking for new ideas, fresh personalities.

Of course... the challenge is in the coalition building and the putting ideas into action. That will bring its own imperfections, as Obama said in his inaugural speech on Monday:


For now decisions are upon us, and we cannot afford delay... We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect. We must act, knowing that today’s victories will be only partial, and that it will be up to those who stand here in four years, and forty years, and four hundred years hence to advance the timeless spirit once conferred to us...